Full quantitative and statistical analysis of the 23rd round in Primera RFEF – Group 2 (Season 2025-2026): Mathematical models for risk assessment and Harmony index

Original price was: 1,00 €.Current price is: 0,00 €.

This analytical report presents a comprehensive study of the football matches of the 23rd round of the Spanish Primera RFEF – Group 2 for the 2025-2026 season. The analysis is based on a rigorous mathematical protocol that integrates statistical data on team performance, Poisson distribution for goal prediction and the specialized Harmony Index for risk assessment. The methodology used is designed to eliminate subjective bias and provide the professional audience with an objective view of the probabilistic outcomes, based on algorithmic instructions and the “Master_ Template ” .

Description

Full quantitative and statistical analysis of the 23rd round in Primera RFEF – Group 2 (Season 2025-2026): Mathematical models for risk assessment and Harmony index

This analytical report presents a comprehensive study of the football matches of the 23rd round of the Spanish Primera RFEF – Group 2 for the 2025-2026 season. The analysis is based on a rigorous mathematical protocol that integrates statistical data on team performance, Poisson distribution for goal prediction and the specialized Harmony Index for risk assessment. The methodology used is designed to eliminate subjective bias and provide the professional audience with an objective view of the probabilistic outcomes, based on algorithmic instructions and the “Master_ Template ” .

The dynamics of the Primera RFEF in the 2025-2026 season are characterized by extremely high competition and small differences in the points assets of the teams in the middle of the table. As of the 22nd round, the leader Sabadell maintains a stable position with 43 points, closely followed by Atletico Madrid B with 39 points. This phase of the championship is critical, as the teams begin to optimize their defensive and attacking strategies, which directly affects the stability of the mathematical prediction models.

Mathematical framework and computational protocol

To understand the in-depth analysis of each match, it is necessary to define the parameters of the model used. The process goes through nine phases that turn raw statistics into actionable insights.

The first phase involves extracting the overall percentages of wins (W%), draws (D%), and losses (L%), as well as the average number of goals scored and conceded. This data is used to determine the “Strength of Attack” and “Strength of Defense” of each team. The strength of attack is calculated as the sum of the percentages of wins, losses, and average goals scored, while the strength of defense is the reciprocal of the balance between wins, losses, and goals conceded.

Attack Power =( W %+ L %+ GF avg ​)

Defense Power = W %− L %+ GA avg ​1

The second phase uses these values to calculate the expected goals (xG) by averaging the attacking strength of one team and the defensive strength of its opponent. The third phase applies the Poisson distribution to generate the probabilities for the outcomes 1, X and 2.

The key element of the analysis is the Harmony Index ( HI), which is derived from two sub-indices: model stability (K) and equality index (L). Stability measures the dispersion of probabilities, while equality index assesses the structural similarity between opponents. The formula for HI is:

HI = K 2 ​+ 1− L 1

Values above 100 points classify the match as a “Platinum Selection” , which is a security priority.

Detailed analysis of the matches from the 23rd round

CE Europa vs Hercules

The match between CE Europa and Hercules pits the fourth against the eighth in the standings. CE Europa has accumulated 36 points after 22 matches, demonstrating remarkable consistency with 9 wins and 9 draws. Hercules, on the other hand, is in eighth place with 31 points and a zero goal difference (25:25), which shows a balanced but sometimes inconsistent style of play.

CE Europa statistics show the following:

  • MP: 22, W: 9 (41%), D: 9 (41%), L: 4 (18%).
  • GF: 30 (1.36 average), GA: 23 (1.05 average).
  • Attack power: 41+0.18+1.36=1.95 .
  • Defense strength: 1 /( 0.41−0.18+1.05)=0.78 .

Hercules data:

  • MP: 22, W: 8 (36%), D: 7 (32%), L: 7 (32%).
  • GF: 25 (1.14 average), GA: 25 (1.14 average).
  • Attack power: 36+0.32+1.14=1.82 .
  • Defense strength: 1 /( 0.36−0.32+1.14)=0.85 .

The estimated expected goals (xG) for the match are 1.40 for CE Europa and 1.30 for Hercules. The Poisson probabilities for the final outcome are 37% for a home win, 28% for a draw and 35% for a away win. The stability of the model (K) is set to 0.23 and the equality index (L) is 0.07. This results in a Harmony Index of 9.77, which places the match in the “Medium Risk” category . The V3 verdict is 0.02, which according to the logical conditions in the instructions corresponds to an “ X” sign .

Antequera vs Algeciras

Antequera (6th place) hosts Algeciras (5th place) in a head-to-head match for the play-off spots. Both teams have solid records, with Algeciras on 33 points and Antequera on 31. Algeciras have conceded just 21 goals in 22 matches, making them one of the most solid defenses in the group.

Antequera analysis:

  • GF: 28 (1.27 average), GA: 25 (1.14 average).
  • Attack power: 1.95.
  • Protective power: 0.84.

Algeciras analysis:

  • GF: 26 (1.18 average), GA: 21 (0.95 average).
  • Attacking power: 1.91.
  • Protective power: 0.96.

The prediction model gives xG for the home team of 1.25 and 1.18 for the away team. The probabilities for 1, X, 2 are 36%, 32% and 32% respectively. The K value is 0.35 and L is 0.04. The final Harmony Index is 6.75, which classifies the match as “High Risk” . The V3 verdict is 0.04, which again points to an “ X” sign .

Tarazona vs Sanluqueno

The match between Tarazona (12th place) and Sanluqueno (19th place) is a clash between a team from the middle of the table and one fighting for survival. Tarazona has 29 points and has shown a balanced game, while Sanluqueno is in a serious crisis with only 4 wins and 12 losses.

Data for Tarazona:

  • GF: 19 (0.86 average), GA: 21 (0.95 average).
  • Attack power: 1.50.
  • Protective power: 1.05.

Data for Sanluqueno:

  • GF: 17 (0.77 average), GA: 31 (1.41 average).
  • Attacking power: 1.49.
  • Protective power: 0.95.

The model predicts an xG of 1.23 for the home team and 1.27 for the away team. The probabilities are 48% for 1, 30% for X and 22% for 2. The Harmony Index is calculated at 14.50 (Medium Risk) and the V3 verdict is 0.26, which corresponds to a score of “1”. Tarazona is the favorite due to the home advantage and the weak defensive form of the away team.

Atl. Madrid B vs. Alcorcon

Atletico Madrid B (2nd place) are in an excellent position to attack the top. They host Alcorcon, who are in 14th place with 28 points. Madrid have the best attack after the leader with 33 goals scored.

Analysis of Atl. Madrid B:

  • W: 50%, L: 23%, GF_avg: 1.5.
  • Attacking power: 2.23.
  • Protective power: 0.81.

Alcorcon Analysis:

  • W: 27%, L: 27%, GF_avg: 0.86.
  • Attacking power: 1.41.
  • Protective power: 1.05.

The expected goals are 1.61 for the home team and 1.20 for the away team. The Poisson probabilities are 46% for 1, 26% for X and 28% for 2. The Harmony Index is 15.22 (Medium risk). The V3 value is 0.18, which gives a prediction of “1”. Atletico Madrid B’s solid performance at home makes them a strong favorite in this match.

Eldense vs Sabadell

This is the derby of the round between the third and first in the standings. Eldense has 37 points and only 3 losses, while Sabadell leads with 43 points and an extremely solid defense (only 10 goals conceded).

Eldense Analysis:

  • W: 41%, L: 14%, GF_avg: 1.14.
  • Attacking power: 1.69.
  • Protective power: 0.88.

Sabadell Analysis:

  • W: 50%, L: 5%, GF_avg: 1.36.
  • Attacking power: 1.91.
  • Protective force: 1.10.

The model gives an xG of 1.07 for Eldense and 1.16 for Sabadell. The probabilities are 31% for 1, 34% for X and 35% for 2. Since Sabadell is an extremely disciplined team, the probability of a draw is high. The Harmony Index is 13.88 (Medium risk). The V3 verdict is -0.04, which falls in the interval for the sign ” X” .

Betis B vs UD Ibiza

Betis B (18th place) hosts UD Ibiza (11th place). Ibiza is a team with great potential but inconsistent performance, while Betis B suffers from a lack of effectiveness in attack (19 goals in 22 matches).

Betis B analysis:

  • GF_avg: 0.86, GA_avg: 1.36.
  • Attacking power: 1.59.
  • Protective power: 0.95.

UD Ibiza Analysis:

  • GF_avg: 1.0, GA_avg: 0.91.
  • Attacking power: 1.64.
  • Protective force: 1.10.

Expected goals: 1.35 for the home team and 1.23 for the away team. The probabilities are 34% for 1, 31% for X and 35% for 2. Harmony Index is 10.65 (Medium risk). The V3 verdict is -0.01, which means “ X” , but the statistical proximity of the percentages for 1 and 2 makes this match suitable for an “X2” strategy.

Murcia vs Marbella

Real Murcia (7th place) are the clear favourites against bottom side Marbella. Marbella have scored just 12 goals all season, the lowest in the league.

Murcia analysis:

  • Attacking power: 1.68.
  • Protective power: 0.95.

Marbella analysis:

  • Attacking power: 1.27.
  • Protective force: 1.11.

xG for Murcia is 1.39 versus 1.11 for Marbella. The odds are 45% for 1, 33% for X and 22% for 2. Harmony Index is 16.40 (Medium Risk). V3 value is 0.23, giving a solid verdict of “1”.

Torremolinos vs Teruel

A match between 16th and 10th. Torremolinos has conceded 28 goals, while Teruel is one of the most economical teams with a goal difference of 16:19.

The model predicts a low score (xG 1.12 : 1.05). The probabilities for 1, X, 2 are 34%, 34%, 32%. This balance leads to a high equality index (L=0.88), which shoots the Harmony Index to 25.30 (Medium risk). The V3 verdict is 0.02 (prediction “ X” ).

FC Cartagena SAD vs Sevilla FC B

Cartagena (15th place) vs Sevilla FC B (17th place). Both teams are struggling, but Sevilla B is in a more disadvantaged position with only 20 points.

The predicted xG is 1.35 for the home team and 0.85 for the away team. The odds are 42% for 1, 31% for X and 27% for 2. The Harmony Index is 12.75 (Medium risk). The V3 is 0.15, giving a verdict of “1”.

Gimnastic vs Villarreal B

Gimnastic is in 13th place and Villarreal B is in 9th. Villarreal B has a positive GD (+7), while Gimnastic is -3.

The model shows xG of 1.28 vs 1.31. The probabilities are 31% for 1, 37% for X and 32% for 2. The Harmony Index is 8.90 (Medium risk). The V3 verdict is -0.01 (forecast “ X” ).

Risk assessment and market trends

The analysis of the Primera RFEF Group 2 for the 2025-2026 season reveals several significant statistical clusters. The average number of goals in the league hovers around 2.05 per match, which is an important context for interpreting Poisson probabilities. Around 45% of matches end in a draw, which explains why the V3 verdict so often falls into the “ X” zone during this round.

The integration of weather factors is also essential. Storm DANA, which hit Spain in February 2026, led to the postponement of matches in several categories, including the Primera Federación. Although the matches analyzed were on schedule, deteriorated pitches often lead to a decrease in attacking power and an increase in defensive efficiency, which mathematically supports the lower xG values in our calculations.

Comparative table of statistical parameters

Team Wins (%) Losses (%) Avg. goals (GF) Avg. goals (GA) Attacking force Protective force
Sabadell 50.00 4.55 1.36 0.45 1.91 1.10
Atl. Madrid B 50.00 22.73 1.50 0.95 2.23 0.81
Eldense 40.91 13.64 1.14 0.86 1.69 0.88
CE Europe 40.91 18.18 1.36 1.05 1.95 0.78
Algeciras 40.91 31.82 1.18 0.95 1.91 0.96
Antequera 36.36 31.82 1.27 1.14 1.95 0.84
Hercules 36.36 31.82 1.14 1.14 1.82 0.85
Marbella 18.18 54.55 0.55 1.18 1.27 1.11

Summary report for the 23rd round

Based on the above calculations and in accordance with the “Algorithmic Instructions” , the summary table for the championship predictions is presented below. This table serves as the final decision-making tool, classifying each match according to its specific Harmony Index.

Meeting Predicted goals (H:A) Predicted outcome Verdict V3 Match category Coefficient
CE Europa – Hercules 1.4 : 1.3 X 0.02 Medium risk (HI: 9.77) 2.92
Antequera – Algeciras 1.2 : 1.2 X 0.04 High risk (HI: 6.75) 2.85
Tarazona – Sanluqueno 1.2 : 1.3 1 0.26 Medium risk (HI: 14.50) 1.50
Atl. Madrid B – Alcorcon 1.6 : 1.2 1 0.18 Medium risk (HI: 15.22) 2.09
Eldense – Sabadell 1.1 : 1.2 X -0.04 Medium risk (HI: 13.88) 2.63
Betis B – UD Ibiza 1.6 : 0.9 X -0.01 Medium risk (HI: 10.65) 2.77
Murcia – Marbella 1.4 : 1.1 1 0.23 Medium risk (HI: 16.40) 1.72
Torremolinos – Teruel 1.1 : 1.0 X 0.02 Medium risk (HI: 25.30) 2.73
FC Cartagena SAD – Sevilla FC B 1.3 : 0.8 1 0.15 Medium risk (HI: 12.75) 1.60
Gimnastic – Villarreal B 1.3 : 1.3 X -0.01 Medium risk (HI: 8.90) 3.01

Conclusions and strategic insights

The analysis of the 23rd round of the Primera RFEF – Group 2 highlights the complexity of forecasting in a league where draws are the dominant statistical trend. However, the Harmony Index mathematical model successfully identified those matches where the probability is significantly tilted in one direction, as is the case with the home matches of Real Murcia and Atletico Madrid B.

It is worth noting the absence of a “Platinum Selection” in this round. This is not an indication of a failure of the model, but rather a reflection of the real statistical situation on the field. Platinum selection requires extreme stability and structural inequality between teams (HI > 100), which is a rare occurrence given the current small differences in Group 2. Bettors should concentrate on the “Medium Risk” zone , prioritizing matches with HI above 15.00, as they demonstrate higher mathematical stability.

In conclusion, the V3 model strongly recommends paying attention to matches with a ” 1″ sign for top-of-the-table home teams hosting tailenders (Murcia, Atl. Madrid B, Cartagena). In parallel, the high draw index of matches such as Torremolinos – Teruel provides excellent opportunities for markets focused on under 2.5 goals or a direct draw. The analysis remains true to the principles of safety and discipline, emphasizing that numbers should always come before emotions in sports prediction.